Most of us probably use the digital version of the manual from MyMopar.com. I certainly do, for the ease and convenience. However, I also have an original manual--with a few grease smudges and dogeared pages--that I rarely use. Not any more.
I grabbed it today to look up a bolt torque, and I suddenly realized that the illustrations in that 49 year old book are FAR more clear than what you see on your computer screen. The scanning/imaging of the e-version just doesn't do justice to the outstanding illustrations--the drawings, diagrams and photographs--in the paper manual. And this really applies to photographs. For instance, the digital pics of carbs or internal trans assemblies (for instance) are terribly dark and grainy, whereas the paper version has perfectly clear "half-tone" pictures were even carb hairpin clips are visible.
Having used original Chrysler manuals for most of my life (I worked in a dealership in the 70s, and had them for my Dart, RR, and Cuda), I should have realized this when I got back into the hobby last spring with the purchase of my Hurst car and the purchase of this nicely used FSM shortly thereafter. Stooopid me.
I wonder if the paper versions sold by Year One compare to the original, or are they also the product of poor scanning.
My two cents, anyhoo.
I grabbed it today to look up a bolt torque, and I suddenly realized that the illustrations in that 49 year old book are FAR more clear than what you see on your computer screen. The scanning/imaging of the e-version just doesn't do justice to the outstanding illustrations--the drawings, diagrams and photographs--in the paper manual. And this really applies to photographs. For instance, the digital pics of carbs or internal trans assemblies (for instance) are terribly dark and grainy, whereas the paper version has perfectly clear "half-tone" pictures were even carb hairpin clips are visible.
Having used original Chrysler manuals for most of my life (I worked in a dealership in the 70s, and had them for my Dart, RR, and Cuda), I should have realized this when I got back into the hobby last spring with the purchase of my Hurst car and the purchase of this nicely used FSM shortly thereafter. Stooopid me.
I wonder if the paper versions sold by Year One compare to the original, or are they also the product of poor scanning.
My two cents, anyhoo.