Dead US auto brands last 20 years

C Body Bob

Old Man with a Hat
Joined
Apr 8, 2012
Messages
12,031
Reaction score
18,924
Location
Youngsville, NC
These auto brands bit the dust in the last 20 years.
American:
Eagle
Plymouth
Pontiac
Oldsmobile
Mercury
Hummer
Saturn
Foreign:
SAAB
Deawo
Isuzu
Sterling (auto) maybe 25 years in it. I’ve only seen 2
Suzuki
Geo
 
Last edited:
hey bob , who's counting , there a few more going that way . but just look at the automotive history of brands dying off and springing up as another . hell chrysler was founded on maxwell i believe , w p chrysler was a mover n shack'r in the beginning he was with buick , then took charge of willis overland , bought that company from the black into the red . i've got a book on him . there is even a picture of wp with all the heads of industry , like ford , edison , ect..... hey this body is a willis overland from when w p chrysler was running it .
DCP01169.JPG
DSC03617.JPG
 
The local car club here had a cruise for discontinued brands only. Was awesome and sad at the same time to see most of these defunct brands (and then realize) what we have lost in the automotive industry.....
 
So what killed off Plymouth?
Plymouth was killed by the same thing that killed Mercury, Olds, and Pontiac, the blurring of the lines in the pricing structure between the makes. When Alfred Sloan came up with the concept in the ‘20s. Chevy was GM’s entry level car and Caddy was the top of the heap. Chrysler followed suit with Plymouth at the bottom and Chrysler on top. The idea worked well until the ‘50s, when all the makes were trying to broaden their appeal by offering the customer bigger cars with more stuff. DeSoto was between Chrysler and Dodge. Chrysler was trying to reach down with lower priced cars and Dodge was moving up, so DeSoto was choked out. By 1970, the differences were almost nonexistent so automakers gave us “badge engineering”. Plymouth, Mercury, Olds and Pontiac died because there was no reason to build them anymore
 
So what killed off Plymouth?
I don't think it was just Dodge, it was whoever was in charge of marketing at the time. Plymouth had always been the best seller of Walters old company. It was the only brand of the old Chrysler Corp that gave the Oval and Bowtie brands a run for the money. While IIRC it did manage to move up to second in sales a few times it could never quite hold on to that spot. It was as much of a performance car as Dodge or any other similar brand was. It was also a great everyday car like Dodge but for some reason they made Dodge the performance car and let Plymouth die it's slow death. I think they screwed up big time by doing that. I've always been a Plymouth guy and always will be.
 
I watch a lot old Chrysler Corp advertising and it seemed like they really went the extra mile on engineering, although they changed the advertising in the 1960s.

The choices in colors, interior and etc are dizzying as the commercial below shows. Now, you seem to get white, gray and black as paint colors in cars.
 
Plymouth was killed by the same thing that killed Mercury, Olds, and Pontiac, the blurring of the lines in the pricing structure between the makes

I think Plymouth saw this coming many years ago (late 50's anyway) and tried damn hard to produce automobiles that were different, better and the most economical vehicles you could get. It showed in their ad campaigns too. Obviously they needed to prove this to Chrysler, and to the rest of the world. I think this attitude payed off for them in spades once the Roadrunner, and probably the Duster too hit the streets.
 
Back
Top