Egg on my face. I apologize for misleading anyone. I am apparently wrong about the 365 horse motor. Don't know where I got that. I guess from the 65 413 365 in Sport Furies.
This is an excerpt from George Riehl of 300Club Intl before he passed away. He was the premier 300 letter car guru.:
"The 1963 and 1964 ram engine used the ram tubes of slightly different design. The inside partitions were made shorter than the 1960 and 1961 engines and the camshaft was again modified to “match” the ram tubes. These camshafts used solid lifters. Larger exhaust valves and “short” tubes teamed with camshaft design, resulted in one of, if not the best, the best performing 300 engines by far.
For the non-ram 1964 and 1965 413-360 HP engines, again the camshaft design was changed to match the single 4 bbl carb. This cam was also hydraulic and was a result of proven performance on the street with the 361, 383, and 426 wedge high-performance engines. This camshaft (design or grind) has powered many a Chrysler product engine from about 1959"
Tom Denkler
This is an excerpt from George Riehl of 300Club Intl before he passed away. He was the premier 300 letter car guru.:
"The 1963 and 1964 ram engine used the ram tubes of slightly different design. The inside partitions were made shorter than the 1960 and 1961 engines and the camshaft was again modified to “match” the ram tubes. These camshafts used solid lifters. Larger exhaust valves and “short” tubes teamed with camshaft design, resulted in one of, if not the best, the best performing 300 engines by far.
For the non-ram 1964 and 1965 413-360 HP engines, again the camshaft design was changed to match the single 4 bbl carb. This cam was also hydraulic and was a result of proven performance on the street with the 361, 383, and 426 wedge high-performance engines. This camshaft (design or grind) has powered many a Chrysler product engine from about 1959"
Tom Denkler
