rush
Active Member
I'm still looking as everyone knows and I have a dealer trying to sell me a 2010 rt with 23k for 23.3. She is loaded and it has a stick. Good bad .
SRT is way more than just an engine upgrade (the hp difference is not 20 by the way, it's more like 90). In addition to that though, it's brakes, suspension, electronics, exhaust, wheels, interior, etc. Completely different cars.
I'm not knocking the R/T, it's all personal choice but I prefer the SRT.
Ross is correct, I prefer the look of the R/T over the SRT. There are subtle differences on visual features as well. The R/T is a ***** in the snow, they say the SRT is even worse, especially with the stock tires. I could have bought either but went with a plum R/T.
Bob, IF you go with an automatic you have to go with the super trac pac option, it gives you everything the SRT Has except for the bigger engine and for $400 more, that was on the 2010 models