Search results for query: *

never did a 300H that I recall was a 1963J with the long ram intakes.

the KB are about 80 grams lighter than the stock pistons

I rode in a 300H there not very fast low 16 second 1/4 mile times. if I raced a 300H with my 67 Newport it would 2 seconds or 20 car lenghts behide my Newport with my 2.94 gears vs the 3.23 gears of the 300H.

thought you said kb 184-40 shows 1.992 pin height. what part # are you looking at.

undersize connecting rod bearing journal could only be one journal and not all of them. not sure on mains

it says the Rebel is a dual plane so it should be better than the weiand ?

any one have a photo of the weiand intake.

is the plug even firing ?

problem with the poly you need headers because of the bad factory exhaust manifolds and then trying to find a 4 barrel intake. what engine would be an easy swap 318 LA-340-360 ? will they bolt up to the trans ?

flat hyd with 1.6 roller tip rockers. best shift point about 5300-5500 rpms. The cam has 488 lift intake and exhaust with 1.5 rockers with my 1.6 rockers brings it to 520 lift

I was thinking that. looks like too many headaches. might just rebuild the poly. would be happy just getting 30-40 more horsepower over stock.

why trans it has a 727 factory now

what does it take to put a 383 into a 1966 fury 318 poly ?

I have no problem with 911 and 520 lift and 6000 rpms. 925 too little 111 lbs seat pressure and too much open at 388 lbs

What do you think 75,000 for the rag top ?

Yes thanks I looked all over. Nothing good I was hoping one of the board members was ready to sell.

been checking there.

wanted a 1962 Chrysler in good to excellent condition. would really want a 300H or 300 but any model I will consider.

comp 911-16 are not really double springs. they have a damper just like the factory put in their higher performance engines. 911 should be all you need unless you're running a solid roller cam.

don't forget only 2.94 gears. LOL