Search results for query: *

  • Users: markp
  • Order by date
  1. markp

    New here

    Thank you
  2. markp

    New here

    No not too far, my son went to school there for a couple years
  3. markp

    New here

    Thanks, yes I am looking forward to these projects.
  4. markp

    New here

    Thank you
  5. markp

    New here

    Thanks, I retired from the Army in 96 too, CW3 automotive maintenance
  6. markp

    New here

    Thank you
  7. markp

    New here

    Thanks
  8. markp

    New here

    My shop is just outside of Fayetteville.
  9. markp

    New here

    That’s a good price, let me think on it for a bit. Thanks
  10. markp

    New here

    Yes, the short rams would be period correct for the 62. I have two 413s, one has the dual 4 bbls and the other is missing the intake and carbs, so a short ram setup would work nice.
  11. markp

    New here

    Thanks for checking that, just out of curiosity what are you asking for them?
  12. markp

    New here

    Thanks
  13. markp

    New here

    They were optional for the 62H. Do you have the casting number? I might be interested if the casting# starts with 21.
  14. markp

    New here

    Yes, I saw that, but lots of parts will work on the H. I was hoping to see a 413 with dual 4bbls under the hood :)
  15. markp

    New here

    Thanks
  16. markp

    New here

    Thanks, I’ll keep that in mind. I am hoping I can get most of what I need from the parts car I have, but things never have a way of working out like that.
  17. markp

    New here

    Thanks
  18. markp

    New here

    Some Forward Look folks claim the 62 300H does not qualify since it lost its fins in 62. Exner was involved with the 62 design prior to leaving Chrysler. Best I can tell the 62 is somewhere between FL and early C-body.
  19. markp

    New here

    You never know, what do you have?
  20. markp

    New here

    Thanks
Back
Top