Too blocked a design for the 440 vs the script for the New Yorker in my opinion to relate them so closely.
It’s obvious that the original designers thought long and hard about the original design and the placement of the name and all the other considerations. Coming in after them to make a change or add, I don’t want to do anything that might conflict with their original good work.
Names, numbers, trim level call outs and badges are all like jewelry on a car’s design and form. They should inform and add. Not get in the way or detract.
I also thought that the chrome of the cornering light would contain the callout better and be about what’s inside which was why I like @Moseman’s idea above of putting it inside the light. Makes it even more subtle.
I also thought long and hard about the lock cover for the trunk I put on. The design idea came from a 72/73 New Yorker which had one. The original design for the Imperial had a huge eagle cover that I honestly thought was... too far from the bumper to be a reminder from the immediate predecessor and previous design tradition. Also, from the rear, you could not see the Brougham shields on the sail panels. So I didn’t see any conflict with reintroducing it on the trunk. Besides, just the lock floating there looked kind of small and lost to me.
Sorry for the tangent but i just wanted to let you all know that I didn't do this lightly.
I’m a designer and sometimes the third version is the best. Thanks to all for your opinions and ideas.
View attachment 241399