Engine call out for NYB’s

They’re stuck on Stan.... Jesus!!!... Relax Mr. two tone Lincoln......

Besides... I think they look cool. I’m going to live with it for a while to try it on.

Bumble bee stripes with peel and stick ventiports would be next..... just for you.

Actually, the Salon top is next....everything I need is almost all in.
The ventiports would be for me... I like Buicks a lot...
 
Too blocked a design for the 440 vs the script for the New Yorker in my opinion to relate them so closely.

It’s obvious that the original designers thought long and hard about the original design and the placement of the name and all the other considerations. Coming in after them to make a change or add, I don’t want to do anything that might conflict with their original good work.

Names, numbers, trim level call outs and badges are all like jewelry on a car’s design and form. They should inform and add. Not get in the way or detract.

I also thought that the chrome of the cornering light would contain the callout better and be about what’s inside which was why I like @Moseman’s idea above of putting it inside the light. Makes it even more subtle.

I also thought long and hard about the lock cover for the trunk I put on. The design idea came from a 72/73 New Yorker which had one. The original design for the Imperial had a huge eagle cover that I honestly thought was... too far from the bumper to be a reminder from the immediate predecessor and previous design tradition. Also, from the rear, you could not see the Brougham shields on the sail panels. So I didn’t see any conflict with reintroducing it on the trunk. Besides, just the lock floating there looked kind of small and lost to me.

Sorry for the tangent but i just wanted to let you all know that I didn't do this lightly.

I’m a designer and sometimes the third version is the best. Thanks to all for your opinions and ideas.

View attachment 241399

Well, I completely understand that, and ultimately I think your ideas are excellent, and many will enjoy that subtle and tasteful mod.
 
A) The FACT that you took the time to search out an appropriate font style for the project says a good deal about your desire to enhance the artistic contribution to the vehicle. A commendation is in order for that.

B) Considering that when the cars came to market, we were in a fuel crisis and "big" was not "in". Engines included. But unless one was around during that time, that historical fact would be lost on whomever might see the new emblem. For those that have a bit of knowledge of that era and the cars from back then, your addition further cements in their database of how fuel hungry the car might be, in their minds. Another form of "conspicuous consumption" in an era when (as now) fuel economy can be important to many. "You're using up all of that gas I'm saving", might be a reaction of some, for example.

C) The 400-4bbl might have been standard in a few years of New Yorkers (440 optional), but to me "New Yorker" associates with either "Hemi" (of appropriate size and generations), 413, or 440. Not unlike a car ad stating "440 big block".

D) Weren't there some repro emblems that could have been converted to "stick-on" that might have "Kept it all in the family"?

Many thoughts, not judging, just contemplating.

Happy NEW YEAR!
CBODY67
 
B) Considering that when the cars came to market, we were in a fuel crisis and "big" was not "in". Engines included. But unless one was around during that time, that historical fact would be lost on whomever might see the new emblem. For those that have a bit of knowledge of that era and the cars from back then, your addition further cements in their database of how fuel hungry the car might be, in their minds. Another form of "conspicuous consumption" in an era when (as now) fuel economy can be important to many. "You're using up all of that gas I'm saving", might be a reaction of some, for example.

C) The 400-4bbl might have been standard in a few years of New Yorkers (440 optional), but to me "New Yorker" associates with either "Hemi" (of appropriate size and generations), 413, or 440. Not unlike a car ad stating "440 big block".

D) Weren't there some repro emblems that could have been converted to "stick-on" that might have "Kept it all in the family"?

Many thoughts, not judging, just contemplating.

Happy NEW YEAR!
CBODY67

Thanks for the very thoughtful response.

I had forgotten about (B). Looking back, no one had engine call outs much after 1974 even on “high performance” vehicles
There were exceptions like trans ams etc. but full sized..... nothing. Even the eldorado dropped its 8.2 liter call out in 73.

Your right about the image of New Yorkers historically having the big boys under their hoods.... hemi, 413, 440. (No call outs at all)

Things got mixed up in the later 70’s formals with their optional engines down to a 360. (Still no call outs)

As to all in the family emblems.... there are a few that I looked at.... (coronet 440 emblem being the one I most looked into but crazy expensive.) And I may return to.... but for $14 bucks I just wanted to see how it would look.

It’s a process.
 
Looks to fit inside easily...

FD4DE073-45D9-4824-BE8F-FEF39397727F.jpeg


85DE9569-0E2B-42FF-A90A-080E6A1C0D70.jpeg
 
My former 300 had a call out added by the previous owner, front fender, behind wheel well. Gotta enlarge pic to see it. I thought it was a nice touch.
IMG_1918.JPG
 
WINCE.GIF


@Mr C will back me up on this.

FFS Jav, a 195hp 440....

I am with Commando1 on this. Imperials and New Yorkers are about dignified elegance (whitewalls every time for these cars).

It doesn't need call outs. Having said that, 73 T&C did a great job of it and didn't go crazy drilling holes.

The trunk lock cover is a definitely acceptable mod and very much in line with the Imperials from which the NYBs came.

Still an outstanding example that I'd be very proud to own. Much respect to Javier!
 
Back
Top