seen....Hemmings Muscle Machines Fury GT

Kept the SB? Well, it's his car. A beauty, regardless. Thanx for passing it on.

611181-1000-0@2x.jpg
 
The entire article was written by someone in the wrong business. What a mess.

Wrong everything to even suggest a GT!? "Standard Fury roof"? - thank God it wasn't.

Remind me not to subscribe to Hemmings Muscle Machines. They must be really hard up for material and writers these days. The guy puts extra insulation in the car and uses headers and performance mufflers, and then complains that it turned out too loud and drones???
What is Tesla hiring for engineers if this guy is one of their materials engineers?
I'm sorry I even read the article. Blue stripe tires??? :realcrazy:
 
Last edited:
I think he knows it,s not a orig GT............

Owner's View
The first owner ordered it in Longview, Washington; the paperwork said "A Lease" on it. The dealership where this car sold new was closing in 1990, around the time I bought it, but I managed to find someone there who remembered it when it was new. The owner special-ordered it: The GT only came as a sport hardtop, and this one has the standard Fury roofline. He also ordered the GT suspension, road wheels and striping, plus heavy-duty cooling and power seat. That's the story I got, anyway. Oh, and the owner's name? Al Alease. This was Al Alease's car, not a leased car.--Tom Flessner
 
HMM is the best magazine out there.... how / why does this car qualify to be in those pages?
Small writing staff... I think those guys live outside of their element a lot of the time. I still like much of what they say/do... but I bet it was the only one they found in good enough condition and with a cooperative owner... They should have waited and gone to Canada... or even NC...

BTW... with all of Hemmings publications to feed, some stuff does get used in more than one to fill pages and much of their staff feeds more than one publication... not so much a complaint as an observation.
 
I was wondering whether I should have just bought the Mustang.

You should have.

I also wish people with slow cars would stop giving their 1/4 mile times. In 1990 (when this guy was building his 340 powered Fake GT) I was 17 and built my first car, a '69 300 4drhtp with a pretty good option load.

I think the 440 had 80k on it. I installed new rings, bearings but did no block work. Purple shaft .484" cam. Heads that I port-matched myself. Headers and a 3.23 SG. I ran a 15.2 @ 92. Undeniably, I was faster than stock. But by a full second over a lighter car? Doubtful.
 
Very confusing article. How many rooflines did the. Fury 2dr come with? I realize it's a clone, but the rear window looks correct, isn't that the same as the GT?
 
440, 76000 miles, 323 sure grip, 92 MPH 15.2 ...
Which is why I said similar numbers

OK good. I was afraid it would be Moparts-math... the formula that says:

B-body: 3900lbs, 383/auto, 3.23 = 14.2 @ 96

C-body: 4200lbs, 440/auto, 3.23 = 16.2 @ 84
 
OK good. I was afraid it would be Moparts-math... the formula that says:

B-body: 3900lbs, 383/auto, 3.23 = 14.2 @ 96

C-body: 4200lbs, 440/auto, 3.23 = 16.2 @ 84

No sir...I'd post the time slip but embarrassed of the RT
 
Back
Top