With a 2.76 gear, I would be happy with a 17 something. LOL!
Maybe a 16....
Maybe a 16....
Nope, if you look at pics of the roofline of my car, it has the coupe roof as opposed to the formal roof that this car has.Very confusing article. How many rooflines did the. Fury 2dr come with? I realize it's a clone, but the rear window looks correct, isn't that the same as the GT?
Consistent reaction times are practice, practice, practice. Your time and mph are matching so car is running correctly, you could be off like mine a 14.92@99.7 mph yes I have a huge lean spot that did reward me with almost 15mpg on the way home from Carlisle.No sir...I'd post the time slip but embarrassed of the RT
Nope, if you look at pics of the roofline of my car, it has the coupe roof as opposed to the formal roof that this car has.
So did GTs come with diff roof lines or this is not a GT and has the wrong roof line?
I am confused on the roof also. I thought there were 2 - the standard with the convex rear glass, and the 'formal' that had a concave glass like the rear of a 67-up Dart. The car in the article looks to have a convex glass, which the GT would have, but the article talks like it has the wrong roof for a GT. Or are there 2 rooflines that have convex rear glass, + the convex, for 3 total?
OK, I am seeing it now. I knew the side view looked like formal, but the rear shot sure confused me, but I can now see it is concave.There are only two roof options. The car in the article is not a real GT, and it has the formal roofline with the concave glass, even though the photo reflections do make the concave glass not look so concave. It is not the convex glass. That is the first giveaway that it is not a real GT.
I really like the interior. A couple more pictures of that would have been nice.