Search results for query: *

I will post a picture as soon as I can snap a few new ones, I lost the ones I had saved in my old phone. I know it would be different on a 4dr, because the pillar is different and this is a quarter window instead of a complete door window. Thanks and I'll post the pics ASAP of the missing side...

I'm looking for the chrome/stainless trim that goes around the driver's side rear quarter window. My car is a 300K but I believe other 2dr Chryslers may be tha same pieces. Any leads appreciated, and thanks in advance!

Same here, plus the long filter which lets you sneak another 1/2qt or so in there. Nice for ZDDP additive, STP, Lucas, Rislone, etc.

I guess the '64 trim is different, my lower piece follows the dovetail of the quarter panel under the quarter window. The '63 you have appears to go straight and then cut back up towards the vertical with an applique below the dovetail. This looks more deluxe, but won't work on my 300k. :'(

Here are some close up pics of the missing trim.

I will try and see if the chrome/stainless quarter window trim is the same for '63 and '64 models. My 300K is missing the driver side lower rear pieces behind/below the quarter window, on the c-pillar and the actual quarter panel. If you are certain that they are the same, and they are in good...

You can see the missing pieces in this photo. I will take a better one ASAP and post it too.

I am looking for the thin exterior chrome/stainless trim around the drivers side rear quarter window. Specifically the two pieces from the door opening to the roof piece. I assume any 2dr hardtop would work, maybe 1963 year also. Thanks!

Thanks for clarifying! Any help locating either a left/DS extension or a complete '61 Ply. bumper would be appreciated! Like I said, driver quality or even bent/less than perfect chrome is fine. Mine is rotten to basically the chrome plating being all that remains at the end.

I'm looking for a driver quality or even slightly damaged rear bumper for my wagon. I specifically need the left/drivers side corner if someone has a spare, but will buy the whole shebang as I understand why someone wouldn't separate a complete one. I think several model years will work, before...

I bet with that duration the XE275HL cam will clear. The .525" lift basically means nothing as far as V/P contact is concerned. A zero deck 383 with a .509" PurpleShaft hydraulic will have contact, almost guaranteed, I have seen customers do it TWICE on '69 model engines. Those MoPar cams have...

Good luck and you will be satisfied I believe! :)

A Crane #683941 might give a little more "free" HP without bad driveability.

This cam is very mild. What are your HP goals? If a standard low-perf (350hp gross rating) crusing is what you're after that cam will suffice.

What more info do you want Andy?

The fast-acting lobes and anti-pump-up lifters really need adjustable valvetrain. If you use regular stock replacement lifters and stock rockers, check your pushrod length carefully. You may need slightly longer pushrods due to reduced base circle on the cam, due to the high lift.

As far as I know, all 340's were the bushed heavy rod, 360 used the same forging with a pressed pin. LA 318's are a crapshoot some years.

Not always. I have torn down 318 LA motors in almost every configuration. SOME early 70's seem to have floating-pin OR pressed pin 340/360 rods, and the early ('67-69) red 318's usually have floating 273-style rods. Never say never, because Ma MoPar will surprise you. On big blocks, you will see...

Personally, I would go with something more modern and with higher lift, but the StreetHemi V2.0 will sound rumbly and have good torque in your 440. The 4 speed really opens-up the options as far as rough idle, but remember that you have modest rearend gearing, so you'll be riding the clutch to...

The minimum lifter diameter is listed. Comp, for example, has a dozen or more .904"-specific listings, hydraulic flat tappet and solid. I have used their "Purple Plus" and "904 race" hydraulics as well as the "MP" and "MM" solids.