For Sale 72 plymouth fury coupe

[69monaco]

1972 Plymouth Fury III

 

[78Brougham]

Damn that's nice... not too keen on the wheels, but that might just be me. Probably a Triple-Pickle going by the top.
Wish these 'tards would take more pics. Not like it costs any more.

 

[300rag]

[QUOTE="78Brougham, post: 462137, member: 2743"...
Wish these 'tards would take more pics. Not like it costs any more.[/QUOTE]

And not all of the same side of the car

 

[polara71]

1972 Plymouth Fury III - $5000 (tacoma)

image 1 of 3

© craigslist - Map data © OpenStreetMap
(google map)

1972 plymouth fury 3

condition: good
cylinders: 8 cylinders
drive: rwd
fuel: gas
paint color: green
size: full-size
title status: clean
transmission: automatic
type: coupe

Sport Coupe, hidden headlights air conditioning. Very nice survivor.

 

[Gary in Pennsylvania]

?....Probably a Triple-Pickle going by the top.

Help me out...... What's a Triple-Pickle?

Thanks!

 

[polara71]

Green paint, green vinyl top, green interior

 

[azblackhemi]

Help me out...... What's a Triple-Pickle?

Thanks!

Triple green, Paint, interior and vinyl top all green.

 

[azblackhemi]

You beat me by a few seconds Dave!

 

[saforwardlook]

One of the best looking Plymouths ever styling wise.

 

[Carmine]

Change from F6 green to Y1 (soft yellow) and I am in love!

 

[78Brougham]

One of the best looking Plymouths ever styling wise.

Agreed Steve. I can't believe they only had that front end for only 1 year!

 

[commando1]

OK. FINALLY, a green pickle even I can love.

 

[Carmine]

Agreed Steve. I can't believe they only had that front end for only 1 year!

When I was a little kid, I used to think the hidden light versions looked like they were wearing sunglasses.

 

[Gary in Pennsylvania]

It's a 360. I have a bunch of pics from the seller. Will post them later. This model car is on top of my 'must have' list.......but I won't take it for the wrong (inflated) price or for less than desirable condition. This one is a nice balance, though I'd prefer a 400+ engine.

 

[Carmine]

It's a 360. I have a bunch of pics from the seller. Will post them later. This model car is on top of my 'must have' list.......but I won't take it for the wrong (inflated) price or for less than desirable condition. This one is a nice balance, though I'd prefer a 400+ engine.

I've had 360s in this era C; they aren't bad at all and there is plenty you can do to increase power while keeping a stock appearance.

But if it doesn't turn your crank, that's ok as well.

 

[69monaco]

Stroke it .

 

[fury fan]

While I agree the styling is good, I cannot agree that it's one of the best-styled Plymouths ever.
There are others I'd rate higher.
As for the 360, putting a mild-cam 5.9 Magnum in its place would make a noticeable improvement in power and MPG, and could keep the existing trans (which is likely a 727).

 

[72Fury]

It looks like a really nice driver.

 

[fc7_plumcrazy]

no reason to mess with the engine. Had a 360 in a 72 Fury once and it ran faster than other C-bodys with a 383-2bbl.

 

[polara71]

no reason to mess with the engine. Had a 360 in a 72 Fury once and it ran faster than other C-bodys with a 383-2bbl.

I seem to remember me making the 360-2 vs 383-2 argument against Gary and you took the side of the BB.

My 71 360 would scream and pulled hard while the 383-2 in the 70' is weak.

No one had my back on those discussions