I suspect y'all are concerned about "space", but there is an engineering reason for Chrysler's being "rear steer" (steering linkage behind the front wheels) rather thanb "front steer" (steering linkage in front of the front wheels). On a sealed and smooth concrete floor, notice that when a rear steer Chrysler product turns a corner, you hear very little tire squal . . . but on a front steer GM car, you hear all kinds of complaints from the front tires doing the same turn. Why? On the rear steer vehicles, the Ackerman angles of the front wheels (in a turn) are much more correct than they are in a front steer vehicle. The one upside of a front steer vehicle is that whenever the tires are turned from straight, they want to slip and therefore generate cornering forces that can result in better transient steering response . . . as the tires are in "slippage mode" sooner.
I can also say that I like driving a rear steer 1977 Corvette better than my front steer 1977 Camaro LT F41, as to the higher accuracy of the steering.
FWIW,
CBODY67