Heavy Metal

Five Essex class aircraft carriers at the Long Beach Naval Shipyard on August 2, 1966.

Interestingly, there are three varieties of carriers here. Three carriers are anti-submarine carriers (technically antisubmarine warfare support aircraft carriers), one is an attack carrier, and the last is a dedicated helicopter assault carrier (Amphibious Assault Ship (Helicopter)).

The carriers are (left to right, bottom to top):
Anti-submarine carrier USS Bennington (CVS-20)
Attack carrier USS Bon Homme Richard (CVA-31)
Anti-submarine carrier USS Yorktown (CVS-10)
Helicopter Assault Carrier USS Valley Forge (LPH-8) Anti-submarine carrier USS Hornet (CVS-12). Also worth noting that only USS Bon Homme Richard is the only one of the five equipped with bridle catchers.

IMG_5848.jpeg
 
Here’s some information about the Boeing 757. It’s the successor to the 727, which I spent a considerable amount of time working on, from 2000-2017, when I retired. That specific jet, N289-MT, also known as Voodoo1, is still flying today….

Voodoo1 used to be based at LAX and now resides at Ontario Airport.


✈️ The Last of the Muscle Jets: Why the Boeing 757 Still Owns the Skies! ⚡

There’s something almost mythical about the Boeing 757 — a jetliner that refuses to be forgotten, even decades after its production ended.

Nicknamed "The Last of the Muscle Jets," the 757 wasn't just another airliner. It was — and still is — a raw powerhouse in the sky, combining strength, speed, and grace like no other.

Here’s why pilots, aviation fans, and passengers alike still rave about it:

⚡️ 1. An Overpowered Beast

The Boeing 757 was famously "over-engined." Its two giant Rolls-Royce RB211 or Pratt & Whitney PW2000 engines gave it an absolutely ridiculous amount of thrust for an airliner its size.

Takeoff roll? Shorter than you'd ever expect.

Climb rate? Steeper than many modern jets today.

Cruising altitude? Reached faster than a wink.

Pilots could lift a heavily loaded 757 off a hot runway at Denver or climb out of tropical airports with a swagger no other narrow-body could match. (It felt more like a fighter jet than a passenger jet!)

✈️ 2. Designed for the Toughest Missions

Built originally to replace the Boeing 727 and handle "hot and high" airports (high elevation and high temperature), the 757 needed muscle — and it delivered. It could operate from short runways and still pack a full load of passengers and cargo across the continent or even the Atlantic.

In fact, its performance was so good that airlines used it for transatlantic routes that were once reserved for widebody jets!

⚙️ 3. A Pilot's Dream Machine

Ask any pilot who has flown the 757 — they’ll likely get a faraway look in their eyes.

"The 757 climbs like a rocket," they’ll tell you.

"It handles like a sports car."

Its cockpit, shared with the 767, was cutting-edge at the time, featuring early glass displays and sophisticated flight management systems. Yet, when you grabbed the yoke, you felt a real, physical connection to the airplane — not the detached feeling some modern fly-by-wire jets give.

⚡ 4. Sheer Presence

Even from the outside, the 757 just looks different.

That tall landing gear.

The sleek, slender fuselage.

The enormous engines hung proudly under the wings.

It was an airliner that looked ready to tear up the sky — and it did. At full throttle, you could feel it — that deep, primal rumble that made airport terminals vibrate!

✨ 5. A Legend Never Truly Retires

Boeing stopped building the 757 in 2004, thinking airlines wanted smaller, lighter jets.

They were wrong.

Today, major airlines still depend on their aging 757s for tough missions — especially where you need long range, high speed, and runway performance that newer aircraft simply can't match.

Even newer jets like the Airbus A321XLR and Boeing 737 MAX 10 are still chasing the shadow of what the 757 could do effortlessly.

In many ways, there's never been a true replacement.

---

In a world of delicate, highly optimized jets, the Boeing 757 remains a relic of a different age — a bold, muscular era where flying wasn't just about efficiency, but about raw power and style.

She’s not just an airplane. She's a legend.

The Last of the Muscle Jets. ✈️⚡❤️


Boeing 727 - Wikipedia

Voodoo 1: The Raytheon Technologies Boeing 727 With A Pointy Nose

Boeing 757 - Wikipedia


IMG_5858.jpeg


IMG_5859.jpeg
IMG_5860.jpeg
 
A muscle jet. first time I heard that term outside of the OEM vehicle businesss. I get it though in context. kind liike "big blocks" in mid-size/intermediate cars (e.g., 454 Corvettes/Chevelles, Hemi B/E bodies, etc). One could make the argument they were "over-engined".

Same reason we never saw a 454 Chevette, or a Hemi Neon, FROM the factory. They'da been sued outta business for putting something like that in the hands of the general public. I know first-hand what our engineers had in mules at the proving grounds that we were NEVER goona build. :poke:.

Looking at that 757, and if you believe the popular media, you can see the alleged "design problem" with the 737 MAX



TANGENT ALERT
1746191295894.png


You go back 25 years and its more pronounced. These later, larger jet engines got really BIG inlets to gobble up air for fuel efficient thrust.

These first 737 (circa 1960) engines were really small, hugged in close to the wing, etc, and the engines were NO WHERE near as powerful/efficient and new engines.

1746191630022.png


Three/four generations later, driver by technology improvements, the basic airframe got "re-engined". Meantime, Airbus emerged later, benefitting from developments in engines NOT available when 737 was designed, and designed the airframe accordingly.

With better engines, the Airbus model (320?) that competed with 737 got more range/fuel economy, etc, than the 737 and was cleaning the 737's clock in terms of orders by airlines.

Allegedly, Boeing had to catch up really fast. They KNEW that (and were perfectly capable of engineering) the 737 would need airframe design changes to hang these newer, more powerful/efficient engines on it.

They allegedly determined they didnt have time to do all that engineering work before Airbus killed them in the marketplace (i.e., once an airline swapped Airbus for Boeing, it would be YEARS (if ever) before Boeing got back in with airlines that swapped).

So, Boeing put these new engines, on an older airframe, by moving them FORWARD/UP on the wing to get the ground clearance they needed. They discovered the plane developed a NEW habit .. it wanted to "nose-up" in flight. Big new engine was acting like a wing and creating lift.
1746193370155.png
1746193397390.png


Solution. ? MCAS.

A software solution that was intended to manage this new, "nose-up" tendency FOR the pilots (vs. training them to deal with it manually).

Then, allegedly, Boeing could tell its airline customers the 737 MAX-8 could be flown "just like" the 737 predecessors. This would save the airline a bundle in pilot training, time/$ to be trained, maintenance of the plane-, etc.

and, didnt need independent flight certification either

As such, it is alleged, Boeing did NOT tell their customers about MCAS. Pilots, not knowing WHY their planes wanted to "nose down", allegedly made flight decisions that resulted in 737 MAX-8 crashes.

I keep saying "alleged" because I really don't have ANY first hand knowledge/am NOT an engineer of the MCAS story.

However, Here is another source: MCAS: what went wrong with 737 MAX
 
Last edited:
Here’s some information about the Boeing 757. It’s the successor to the 727, which I spent a considerable amount of time working on, from 2000-2017, when I retired. That specific jet, N289-MT, also known as Voodoo1, is still flying today….

Voodoo1 used to be based at LAX and now resides at Ontario Airport.


✈️ The Last of the Muscle Jets: Why the Boeing 757 Still Owns the Skies! ⚡

There’s something almost mythical about the Boeing 757 — a jetliner that refuses to be forgotten, even decades after its production ended.

Nicknamed "The Last of the Muscle Jets," the 757 wasn't just another airliner. It was — and still is — a raw powerhouse in the sky, combining strength, speed, and grace like no other.

Here’s why pilots, aviation fans, and passengers alike still rave about it:

⚡️ 1. An Overpowered Beast

The Boeing 757 was famously "over-engined." Its two giant Rolls-Royce RB211 or Pratt & Whitney PW2000 engines gave it an absolutely ridiculous amount of thrust for an airliner its size.

Takeoff roll? Shorter than you'd ever expect.

Climb rate? Steeper than many modern jets today.

Cruising altitude? Reached faster than a wink.

Pilots could lift a heavily loaded 757 off a hot runway at Denver or climb out of tropical airports with a swagger no other narrow-body could match. (It felt more like a fighter jet than a passenger jet!)

✈️ 2. Designed for the Toughest Missions

Built originally to replace the Boeing 727 and handle "hot and high" airports (high elevation and high temperature), the 757 needed muscle — and it delivered. It could operate from short runways and still pack a full load of passengers and cargo across the continent or even the Atlantic.

In fact, its performance was so good that airlines used it for transatlantic routes that were once reserved for widebody jets!

⚙️ 3. A Pilot's Dream Machine

Ask any pilot who has flown the 757 — they’ll likely get a faraway look in their eyes.

"The 757 climbs like a rocket," they’ll tell you.

"It handles like a sports car."

Its cockpit, shared with the 767, was cutting-edge at the time, featuring early glass displays and sophisticated flight management systems. Yet, when you grabbed the yoke, you felt a real, physical connection to the airplane — not the detached feeling some modern fly-by-wire jets give.

⚡ 4. Sheer Presence

Even from the outside, the 757 just looks different.

That tall landing gear.

The sleek, slender fuselage.

The enormous engines hung proudly under the wings.

It was an airliner that looked ready to tear up the sky — and it did. At full throttle, you could feel it — that deep, primal rumble that made airport terminals vibrate!

✨ 5. A Legend Never Truly Retires

Boeing stopped building the 757 in 2004, thinking airlines wanted smaller, lighter jets.

They were wrong.

Today, major airlines still depend on their aging 757s for tough missions — especially where you need long range, high speed, and runway performance that newer aircraft simply can't match.

Even newer jets like the Airbus A321XLR and Boeing 737 MAX 10 are still chasing the shadow of what the 757 could do effortlessly.

In many ways, there's never been a true replacement.

---

In a world of delicate, highly optimized jets, the Boeing 757 remains a relic of a different age — a bold, muscular era where flying wasn't just about efficiency, but about raw power and style.

She’s not just an airplane. She's a legend.

The Last of the Muscle Jets. ✈️⚡❤️


Boeing 727 - Wikipedia

Voodoo 1: The Raytheon Technologies Boeing 727 With A Pointy Nose

Boeing 757 - Wikipedia


View attachment 718241

View attachment 718242View attachment 718243
For a while, 767s were flying out of Chicago Midway. The airport is 1 mile x 1 mile. The longest runways run from corner to corner by necessity, meaning the they’re less than 7,400 feet long. The rest of the planes flying in and out were mostly 737s and DC 9s so it was pretty spectacular to see a big plane like the 767, especially when talking off.
 
What was the significance between the Rolls and the P&W? Were they spec's differently or just awarded contracts based on cost or production capacity?
 
What was the significance between the Rolls and the P&W? Were they spec's differently or just awarded contracts based on cost or production capacity?
a whole buncha info (accuracy indeterminate) in Quora.com and other sources:

"What are the differences between the PW-2000 and the RB-211 engines on the Boeing 757"

"In 1979 Pratt & Whitney launched its PW2000 engine after the RB211, claiming
8% better fuel efficiency than the -535C for the PW2037 version.

Boeing put Rolls-Royce under pressure to supply a more competitive engine for the 757, and using the more advanced -524 core as a basis, the company produced the 40,100lbf thrust RB211-535E4 which entered service in October 1984. While still not quite as efficient as the PW2037, it was more reliable and quieter.


The P&W is a lighter engine, and does normally give a little bit longer range. However I understand that the RR has historically demonstrated greater reliability in service.

I think the reliability of the RB211-535 series has been the overriding factor in chosing the RR engines over the P&W. I also think that on this aircraft (757), RR seems to always be first with delivery of the next higher thrust class engine when it was requested by Boeing, which doesn't hurt sales.

The RR (RB211-535C) was also the first engine to be certified on the 757 when it was first introduced by Boeing. The PW2000 was a late comer to the game.

In other words, RR seems to have always been in the lead with engines for the 757.

The latest version of the PW-2000 provides 43,000 lbs. of thrust with a turbofan bypass ratio of 6.0:1.

The latest version of the RB-211 provides 60,600 lbs. of thrust with a turbofan bypass ratio of 4.4:1".
 
What was the significance between the Rolls and the P&W? Were they spec's differently or just awarded contracts based on cost or production capacity?
Commercial jets are like semi trucks in that the buyer can choose the engine.
GE, Rolls Royce and Pratt & Whitney are all choices.
I don’t believe that each manufacturer is available for every commercial jet, but the engine choice is the buyers.
 
This wild-looking thing is the T87, (full designation: Carriage, Motor, Amphibian, 105mm Howitzer, T87). It was an attempt to create an amphibious version of the M18 Hellcat tank destroyer. The running gear and lower hull are taken from the M18, but the upper hull is specially made to enable it to float. The turret was taken from the T88, and contains a gyro stabilised 105 mm gun. Despite these major modifications, the T87 could still reach 43 mph on land. It never entered production.

IMG_5870.jpeg
 
In the 1970s, four roaring F-101 Voodoos, including the brightly painted Hawk One Canada jet, thrilled airshow crowds across the Northwest and British Columbia. Their signature afterburner double-boom and striking blackhawk paint scheme made the Canadian CF-101s unforgettable. Though the Voodoo era has passed, memories of those powerful performances still echo today. Read more:

Hawk One Canada was an air show stunner — General Aviation News


IMG_5888.jpeg
IMG_5887.jpeg
IMG_5886.jpeg
 
At the time of its creation the IS-7 was the most advanced tank in the world. It featured a complex armour layout, a 1,000 hp diesel engine, remote control machine guns and an autoloader.

The IS-7 has been popularised by the online game World of Tanks, where it is known for its virtually impenetrable turret. Surprisingly this isn’t too far from reality.

IS-7 - Wikipedia

IMG_5897.jpeg
 
Inquiring minds.

three-min video on why it looks like rockets appear to be curving as they ascend. its because they really are flying in an arc, or in other words making "Gravity turns"

space shuttle launch below, after its roll maneuver is initiated. Thirty-seconds into the second vid, you can see it roll over on its back, so to speak.
1280px-4th_FW_Strike_Eagles_assist_shuttle_launch.jpg



 
Last edited:
This one? Urban legend written all over it -- but if true, might be accurate as to performance of the planes mentioned.




whaddaya know .. the actual SR--71 pilot tells the story. all true, apparently.

 
Last edited:
A workshop at the American Bethlehem Steel plant. In the foreground are the 14-inch gun turrets of the New York-class battleships, and behind them are the same 234/50-mm coastal mounts that armed three MkIPV batteries.

1747100689203.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top