56 DeSoto Hemi intake choices

C Body Bob

Old Man with a Hat
Joined
Apr 8, 2012
Messages
12,032
Reaction score
18,925
Location
Youngsville, NC
ok folks what’s out there as far as intakes. Did they off a stock 4bbl on this engine. If so how hard are they to find. Was there ever any aluminum intakes made for them. Would like to find a good used single 4bbl but I have my doubts such a thing exist. I remember WAY back 10-15 years ago a company was fielding orders for one & made a prototype but I don’t think they got enough interest to produce any. What do you guys know
 
ok folks what’s out there as far as intakes. Did they off a stock 4bbl on this engine. If so how hard are they to find. Was there ever any aluminum intakes made for them. Would like to find a good used single 4bbl but I have my doubts such a thing exist. I remember WAY back 10-15 years ago a company was fielding orders for one & made a prototype but I don’t think they got enough interest to produce any. What do you guys know

Are you talking 330 hemi?
 
'56 Desoto was offered with two 330cid engines. The 2BBL version was rated at 230 hp, the 4BBL version was rated at 255hp. The adventurer series was offered with a 341 cid rated at 320hp. There were aftermarket 4BBL manifolds available for the 330cid engine, Offenhauser made one. Do not know if any manufacturer still offers them.

Dave
 
'56 Desoto was offered with two 330cid engines. The 2BBL version was rated at 230 hp, the 4BBL version was rated at 255hp. The adventurer series was offered with a 341 cid rated at 320hp. There were aftermarket 4BBL manifolds available for the 330cid engine, Offenhauser made one. Do not know if any manufacturer still offers them.

Dave
So it’s a 330 CI engine ? I didn’t realize it was that big.
 
The following hemi engines were offered in Desoto models in different years.
In overview they made 3 different Hemi engines for Desoto, 330, 341 and 345. Firedome engines were 2 barrels, Firesweep engines were 4 barrels, and Firesweeps in Adventurers (345 engines) had dual 4 barrel carbs.
 
Last edited:
Other than the crank to converter interface, isn't the bolt pattern for the transmission to the engine the same as an "A" motor? Which would then include the 318 prior to 1966? Considering that the Poly Spitfire engine was allegedly a hemi with different heads on it?

It's been a while since I read some of that in an old "Hot Rod Annual", circa 1965 or so? The particular article detailed many of the differences in the early hemis, at a time when they were "just an engine" as the newer 426 HEMIs were getting all of the attention in stock-racer classes. Quite an in-depth article of what fit what, in the various engine sizes of the early hemis.

Just some curiousities, from a while back,
CBODY67
 
Other than the crank to converter interface, isn't the bolt pattern for the transmission to the engine the same as an "A" motor? Which would then include the 318 prior to 1966? Considering that the Poly Spitfire engine was allegedly a hemi with different heads on it?

It's been a while since I read some of that in an old "Hot Rod Annual", circa 1965 or so? The particular article detailed many of the differences in the early hemis, at a time when they were "just an engine" as the newer 426 HEMIs were getting all of the attention in stock-racer classes. Quite an in-depth article of what fit what, in the various engine sizes of the early hemis.

Just some curiousities, from a while back,
CBODY67

The bolt pattern is not the issue, the flange mount for the crank has a different offset necessitating an index spacer. This requires a ring style adapter to move the modern torqueflite farther back. The modern transmission has a different indexing hub on the convertor that is not found on the early transmission (early transmission convertor bolts directly to the crank). The solid disc flex plate supplied with the adapter kit is off set to compensate.

Dave
 
Last edited:
Back
Top