Very interesting, thanks!
I’m surprised that nobody has raised the issue of drastic front suspension changes when manufacturers switched over to radial tires.
The old bias ply tires did not sit flat on the pavement when cornering like radial tires do.
There was, also, very little flex in the sidewall on bias ply tires.
Radial tires are supposed to lay flat on the pavement and one of the ways this is accomplished is to soften the sidewall. The other way is to drastically modify the front suspension.
Bias ply tires tend to break into a skid quite gradually whereas radial tires suddenly break loose when the over-stressed sidewall snaps the tread back under the center of the rim, thus suddenly breaking traction.
I’ve been running radial tires on a bunch of bias ply vehicles since radials first came out.
My hemi powered 34 Ford has them and I DRIVE that car from the Boston area to Louisville, KY every year.
I put radials on Tex Smith’s old ‘48 Chrysler in Rawlings, Wyoming in ‘86 when I bought it and drove it home to eastern Mass from Tex’s place in Driggs,ID.
My ‘72 Dart Swinger has had them since I got it in the early eighties. It's a drum brake car and was set up for bias ply tires. It was my daily driver until I hurt my back at work and couldn’t comfortably sit in the bench seat and my 47 year old daughter got it as her first car when she got her license in high school.
My bought- it-new ‘68 GTX got switched over to radials nearly twenty years ago when I restored it
I run all of these vehicles between 32 and 35 psi.tire pressure (just like I do with my three Dodge Magnums)
Also, ANY gas filled shock is going to give you a harder ride. That’s to keep the radial tire firmly planted on the pavement. If you’re unsatisfied with the ride, put the original type shocks back on it.
On the oil topic, I run Valvoline VR-1 20-50 in the ‘34 and GTX and the rest of the fleet gets Shell Rotella with a bottle of ZDDP. Rotella used to have lots of zinc but not anymore.