300rag
It's Not Going to Shift Itself
sure why not. drop some tabs and the world is whatever you want/need it to be.
Is that how your sig pic came about?

sure why not. drop some tabs and the world is whatever you want/need it to be.

I got stuff way better than LSD.Is that how your sig pic came about?![]()
I got stuff way better than LSD.
Then you should really have an appreciation of vertical stabilizers.
Oh You must be referring to them big fins they used to slap on the back of cars and called it good design, yes that must be it.

No. I have no can to rattle. Style is meant to please through various means and make you "think" you want something so badly you must have it, or your making a good decision by purchasing it.....because everyone else is, so....therefore, logic dictates it MUST be good (that's not logic by the way). The truth is Exner and those of his ilk were masters at this manipulation (obviously - right?). I would not go so far as to say Chrysler designers were mimicking Pontiac, seems to me it might be the other way around. Some of the pontiac designs might be similar, but I don't think they were REALLY cognisant of what they were doing....they got to where they did purely by quaint happenstance. Take the 69' Bonneville, mmmmm, well sorta, kinda not bad in some ways.....and then you design a beak into the middle of the grill. For what? That's were the Pontiac express went off the tracks...and they did that with other models as well. So Chrysler following Pontiac? Difficult pill to swallow.No, you are looking for a reason and trying to split hairs. BOTH were designs of the times.....and to rattle your can more, the C's of 1969 and 70 were styled after pontiacs........the Chrysler designers loved their Pontiacs