What would you spend for......

I personally did the FBBO dyno test with the log manifolds and the HP ones. Gained 2 lb-ft of torque at 2,700 rpm from 403 to 405 and 4 HP from 272 to 276 @ 4,300 rpm.
 
I personally did the FBBO dyno test with the log manifolds and the HP ones. Gained 2 lb-ft of torque at 2,700 rpm from 403 to 405 and 4 HP from 272 to 276 @ 4,300 rpm.
Sorry for the wrong numbers glad you piped up the record straight.
 
So basically zero noticeable improvement.

Kevin
They would make sense as part of a modest upgrade package for the street i.e. better pistons, rockers, cleaned up heads, intake and exhaust manifolds, 2.5" exhaust with cross over. All in you might gain 10-15% better output over stock. Just as a single add on item hardly worth it. But as mentioned they look cool...:rolleyes:.
 
What do these things look like??
 
383-440 HP C body manifold
1967 440HP manifolds 1 July 2016 013.JPG
1967 440HP manifolds 1 July 2016 013.JPG
1967 440HP manifolds 1 July 2016 014.JPG


1967 440HP manifolds 1 July 2016 015.JPG
 
Really? How can I prove it if true??
 
Well then I will ask what stock manifolds look like then?
 
So what numbers would confirm that? Or any numbers would in that position on the manifold??
 
Here is a pic from the other side. I don't know if it will confirm anything. Looking at how high the manifolds rise on the valve covers ,,maybe they are . Never occurred to me. From this pic it looks like the manifold could really cook the oil inside the valve cover.


20160622_151830.jpg
 
Last edited:
I see,,,thankyou for the info.
 
look at the number in the picture. The HP is 2863409. The log is 2463107( 66-69 383-440 LP driver side)
 
Last edited:
Thanks for all the info. I will write down the numbers today.
 
Dual snorkel, Super Commando, hi-rise exhaust manifolds....
It should be fairly obvious.
318 big block Max Wedge Hemi. :p
 
Back
Top