Finally got my Exner book!
That was already 3 years ago???Did anyone go to off site meeting (at some hotel) in Carlisle a year or two ago, and hear what Exner's son had to say about his Dad and his car designs?
Jazabelle was invited to be part of a special display, (Full sized American convertibles), at the Concourse D'Elegance of America in 2013. Exner designs were featured at that event and Virgil Exner Jr was part of a design panel that gave a 2 hour seminar. Ellie and I enjoyed that.
That was already 3 years ago???
They seem to been raping each other insofar as the design language (or "look") goes....although every now and again one of the automakers will come out with something fresh..or a reguritation of a previous language with modern changes to freshen it up.....e.i. Cadillacs "art & science" look (think thats wut they called it way back then)...long unbroken lines, very intense sharp angles, "jewel" like headlights...a few other attributes thrown in for good measure. IMO a great many factors contribute to why a certian design language becomes diluted...."costs" (the perview of bean counters) comes to mind first and for most.Styling has to be outsourced to explain all the identical mid sized sedans.
With the "corporate front end" concept like Chevrolet and Cadillac, that run ten years, they don't need stylists.
That was already 3 years ago???
the Concourse D'Elegance of America in 2013
Amazing how fast time gets by. I remember the event like it was last week. There were a couple of FCBO members there. I met you there Matt, and Mike from Columbus was there. There's been a lot of "roadway" under Jazabelles wheels since then.
Not this time of year, keep that clock wound tight till the spring equinox.I wish we could slow down the clock......
I just stumbled on an excellent thread from 2010, where John Samsen, a retired Chrysler designer from '55 to '76, describes the conception of the Exner cars:
Viewing a thread - Mopar Styling info, 2010 Carlisle heads-up
I wonder if mr. Samsen is still around. He'd be 88 by now.
Dammit, they were absolutely adamant about making sure that snout was going to be on any car that would make it to production.
It is probably good that the full size cars didn't get built as initially planned. In my eyes, they just looked goofy. The downsized models were at least passable and better looking than what their full size clay models would have been. To think they would have made any inroads on the clean Chevrolet and Ford designs, if a bit boring, was wishful thinking IMO. It seems Exner ran hot and cold in his designs, and for the cars that actually went into production in the Forward Look years from 1955 through 1961, it was really the studio designs with input from Tex Colbert and other management that really were responsible for the greatness of those cars - and not so much Exner.